TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union vs Building Trades Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

Building Trades Federal Credit Union

Maple Grove, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

73of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureToro Employees Federal Credit UnionBuilding Trades Federal Credit Union
TellerScore84 (stronger)73
Capital cushion95 (stronger)59
Loan quality8190 (stronger)
Earnings73 (stronger)63
Funding & liquidity7279 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage94 (stronger)79
Peer percentile75th60th
Total assets$41.5M$249.9M
Deposits / shares$34.9M$217.5M
Capital ratio14.46% (stronger)10.92%
Problem loans0.56%0.29% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.30%0.28% (stronger)
Return on assets1.34% (stronger)1.08%
Loans ÷ deposits88.0%71.2% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.1% (stronger)23.8%
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—7.9%

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Toro Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Building Trades Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions