TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union vs Electric Machinery Employees Credit Union

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

Electric Machinery Employees Credit Union

Minneapolis, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

71of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureToro Employees Federal Credit UnionElectric Machinery Employees Credit Union
TellerScore84 (stronger)71
Capital cushion95100 (stronger)
Loan quality81 (stronger)60
Earnings73 (stronger)5
Funding & liquidity72100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9496 (stronger)
Peer percentile75th42nd
Total assets$41.5M$8.4M
Deposits / shares$34.9M$6.3M
Capital ratio14.46%24.60% (stronger)
Problem loans0.56% (stronger)1.20%
Net charge-offs0.30%-0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.34% (stronger)-0.38%
Loans ÷ deposits88.0%58.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.1%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 71). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Toro Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Electric Machinery Employees Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions