TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union vs Sharepoint Credit Union

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

Sharepoint Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureToro Employees Federal Credit UnionSharepoint Credit Union
TellerScore84 (stronger)68
Capital cushion95 (stronger)68
Loan quality81 (stronger)66
Earnings73 (stronger)44
Funding & liquidity7287 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage94 (stronger)89
Peer percentile75th45th
Total assets$41.5M$360.1M
Deposits / shares$34.9M$317.6M
Capital ratio14.46% (stronger)11.80%
Problem loans0.56% (stronger)1.02%
Net charge-offs0.30%0.20% (stronger)
Return on assets1.34% (stronger)0.60%
Loans ÷ deposits88.0%73.2% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.1% (stronger)5.1%
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—12.5%

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Toro Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Sharepoint Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions