TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union vs Wakota Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

Wakota Federal Credit Union

South St Paul, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureToro Employees Federal Credit UnionWakota Federal Credit Union
TellerScore84 (stronger)66
Capital cushion95 (stronger)60
Loan quality81 (stronger)50
Earnings73 (stronger)67
Funding & liquidity7291 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage94 (stronger)83
Peer percentile75th32nd
Total assets$41.5M$44.8M
Deposits / shares$34.9M$39.4M
Capital ratio14.46% (stronger)10.95%
Problem loans0.56% (stronger)1.49%
Net charge-offs0.30% (stronger)1.13%
Return on assets1.34% (stronger)1.18%
Loans ÷ deposits88.0%69.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.1%0.8% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Toro Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Wakota Federal Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions