TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Trades & Labor Federal Credit Union vs Accentra Credit Union

Credit union

Trades & Labor Federal Credit Union

Albert Lea, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

85of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Accentra Credit Union

Austin, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureTrades & Labor Federal Credit UnionAccentra Credit Union
TellerScore85 (stronger)61
Capital cushion100 (stronger)57
Loan quality65 (stronger)48
Earnings83 (stronger)55
Funding & liquidity8487 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage91 (stronger)79
Peer percentile77th24th
Total assets$23.0M$208.2M
Deposits / shares$19.4M$186.4M
Capital ratio15.27% (stronger)10.67%
Problem loans1.04% (stronger)1.57%
Net charge-offs0.32% (stronger)1.21%
Return on assets1.57% (stronger)0.88%
Loans ÷ deposits76.5%72.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)4.0%
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—14.5%

Trades & Labor Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Trades & Labor Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Accentra Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions