TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Transit Workers Federal Credit Union vs I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Transit Workers Federal Credit Union

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

47of 100
Below average

Credit union

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureTransit Workers Federal Credit UnionI.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore4798 (stronger)
Capital cushion49100 (stronger)
Loan quality3398 (stronger)
Earnings091 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)99
Problem-loan coverage86100 (stronger)
Peer percentile7th98th
Total assets$14.6M$15.4M
Deposits / shares$13.1M$13.0M
Capital ratio9.87%15.39% (stronger)
Problem loans2.00%0.07% (stronger)
Net charge-offs3.53%-0.08% (stronger)
Return on assets-1.93%1.78% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits38.4% (stronger)61.6%
Uninsured deposits1.4%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 47). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Transit Workers Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions