Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Tribe Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Tribe Federal Credit Union | Latvian Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 (stronger) | 62 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 60 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 72 |
| Earnings | 4 | 35 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 71 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 88 |
| Peer percentile | 68th | 24th |
| Total assets | $2.7M | $5.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.0M | $5.2M |
| Capital ratio | 28.23% (stronger) | 11.01% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.85% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.38% |
| Return on assets | -0.41% | 0.37% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 30.5% (stronger) | 89.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% (stronger) | 6.4% |
| Offices | 0 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Tribe Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Tribe Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Latvian Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.