Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Trustmark Bank vs Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union
Eufaula, Alabama · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Trustmark Bank | Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 62 |
| Capital cushion | 54 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 62 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 73 (stronger) | 41 |
| Funding & liquidity | 49 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 86 | 86 |
| Peer percentile | 35th | 24th |
| Total assets | $19.2B | $40.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $16.2B | $31.1M |
| Capital ratio | 10.40% | 22.98% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.14% (stronger) | 6.71% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% (stronger) | 0.92% |
| Return on assets | 1.33% (stronger) | 0.53% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.7% | 31.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 37.0% | 1.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 163 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 191 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 11.8 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 14.7% | — |
Both have the same TellerScore. On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Trustmark Bank leads on 3 and Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.