Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Trustmark Bank vs Renasant Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Trustmark Bank | Renasant Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 64 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 54 | 57 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 62 | 68 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 73 | 76 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 49 (stronger) | 39 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 86 | 91 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 35th | 46th |
| Total assets | $19.2B | $27.0B |
| Deposits / shares | $16.2B | $22.2B |
| Capital ratio | 10.40% | 10.72% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.14% | 0.96% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% | 0.05% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.33% | 1.40% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.7% | 86.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 37.0% (stronger) | 46.3% |
| Offices | 163 | 246 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 191 | 113 |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 11.8 | 5.1 (stronger) |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 14.7% | 11.6% |
Renasant Bank has the higher TellerScore (64 vs 62). On the 8 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Trustmark Bank leads on 1 and Renasant Bank on 7. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Jackson, MS
- Mobile, AL
- Hattiesburg, MS
- Tupelo, MS
- Birmingham, AL
- Memphis, TN
- Montgomery, AL
- Ridgeland, MS
- Madison, MS
- Oxford, MS
- Huntsville, AL
- Corinth, MS
- Santa Rosa Beach, FL
- Pensacola, FL
- Columbus, MS
- Flowood, MS
- Gulfport, MS
- Southaven, MS
- Starkville, MS
- Laurel, MS
- Bartlett, TN
- Pearl, MS
- Clinton, MS
- Panama City, FL
- Olive Branch, MS
- Tuscaloosa, AL
- Hazlehurst, MS
- Horn Lake, MS
- Spanish Fort, AL
- Saraland, AL