TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Tuscaloosa V a Federal Credit Union vs Alabama Credit Union

Credit union

Tuscaloosa V a Federal Credit Union

Tuscaloosa, Alabama · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

Alabama Credit Union

Tuscaloosa, Alabama · $1 billion – $10 billion

60of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureTuscaloosa V a Federal Credit UnionAlabama Credit Union
TellerScore84 (stronger)60
Capital cushion81 (stronger)49
Loan quality92 (stronger)73
Earnings65 (stronger)35
Funding & liquidity91 (stronger)75
Problem-loan coverage97 (stronger)86
Peer percentile75th25th
Total assets$51.9M$2.1B
Deposits / shares$45.6M$1.8B
Capital ratio13.07% (stronger)9.91%
Problem loans0.24% (stronger)0.80%
Net charge-offs0.68% (stronger)0.90%
Return on assets1.12% (stronger)0.37%
Loans ÷ deposits69.0% (stronger)85.3%
Uninsured deposits4.1% (stronger)7.1%
Offices116
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—22.1%

Tuscaloosa V a Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 60). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Tuscaloosa V a Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Alabama Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions