Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Twin River Bank vs WaFd Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Twin River Bank | WaFd Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 89 (stronger) | 61 |
| Capital cushion | 78 (stronger) | 42 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 79 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 60 |
| Funding & liquidity | 77 (stronger) | 47 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 32nd |
| Total assets | $173.0M | $27.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $150.5M | $21.1B |
| Capital ratio | 12.76% (stronger) | 9.21% |
| Problem loans | 0.16% (stronger) | 0.63% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.10% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 3.04% (stronger) | 0.99% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 77.1% (stronger) | 95.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 20.5% (stronger) | 31.1% |
| Offices | 4 | 210 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | 93 |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | 4.4 |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 24.2% | 18.8% |
Twin River Bank has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Twin River Bank leads on 6 and WaFd Bank on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.