TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Ume Federal Credit Union vs California Adventist Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Ume Federal Credit Union

Burbank, California · $100 million – $1 billion

74of 100
Strong

Credit union

California Adventist Federal Credit Union

Glendale, California · Under $100 million in assets

89of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureUme Federal Credit UnionCalifornia Adventist Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7489 (stronger)
Capital cushion49100 (stronger)
Loan quality8299 (stronger)
Earnings72 (stronger)57
Funding & liquidity99 (stronger)84
Problem-loan coverage94100 (stronger)
Peer percentile63rd87th
Total assets$327.9M$44.7M
Deposits / shares$296.7M$35.5M
Capital ratio9.86%20.11% (stronger)
Problem loans0.54%0.04% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.47%-0.02% (stronger)
Return on assets1.29% (stronger)0.92%
Loans ÷ deposits56.7% (stronger)76.0%
Uninsured deposits16.6%0.8% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)3.8%—

California Adventist Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Ume Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and California Adventist Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions