TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Valley Communities Credit Union vs M.E. Employees Credit Union

Credit union

Valley Communities Credit Union

Mosinee, Wisconsin · $100 million – $1 billion

83of 100
Strong

Credit union

M.E. Employees Credit Union

Wausau, Wisconsin · Under $100 million in assets

62of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureValley Communities Credit UnionM.E. Employees Credit Union
TellerScore83 (stronger)62
Capital cushion80 (stronger)48
Loan quality91 (stronger)86
Earnings56 (stronger)43
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)63
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)83
Peer percentile83rd24th
Total assets$306.9M$19.0M
Deposits / shares$264.2M$17.1M
Capital ratio12.97% (stronger)9.80%
Problem loans0.28% (stronger)0.42%
Net charge-offs0.06% (stronger)0.21%
Return on assets0.91% (stronger)0.58%
Loans ÷ deposits59.2% (stronger)97.4%
Uninsured deposits6.0%0.0% (stronger)
Offices81
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%—

Valley Communities Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Valley Communities Credit Union leads on 6 and M.E. Employees Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions