Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Valley Premier Bank vs Border Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Valley Premier Bank | Border Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 (stronger) | 57 |
| Capital cushion | 61 (stronger) | 41 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 64 |
| Earnings | 78 (stronger) | 72 |
| Funding & liquidity | 82 (stronger) | 45 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 80 |
| Peer percentile | 80th | 16th |
| Total assets | $141.0M | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $127.7M | $922.6M |
| Capital ratio | 11.13% (stronger) | 9.07% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.07% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Return on assets | 1.44% (stronger) | 1.31% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 70.1% (stronger) | 96.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 22.3% (stronger) | 32.1% |
| Offices | 2 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 2.1% | 3.7% |
Valley Premier Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Valley Premier Bank leads on 7 and Border Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.