Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
VeraBank, National Association vs First Texas Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | VeraBank, National Association | First Texas Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 60 (stronger) | 51 |
| Loan quality | 68 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 84 | 96 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 76 (stronger) | 75 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 66th | 80th |
| Total assets | $4.6B | $259.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $4.0B | $232.4M |
| Capital ratio | 11.03% (stronger) | 10.14% |
| Problem loans | 0.96% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.10% | -0.09% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.61% | 1.90% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 68.8% | 39.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 29.0% (stronger) | 38.2% |
| Offices | 42 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 17.9% |
First Texas Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), VeraBank, National Association leads on 2 and First Texas Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.