TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

VisionBank vs Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

VisionBank

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

57of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureVisionBankToro Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5784 (stronger)
Capital cushion5095 (stronger)
Loan quality4081 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)73
Funding & liquidity4372 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage5994 (stronger)
Peer percentile14th75th
Total assets$253.9M$41.5M
Deposits / shares$183.6M$34.9M
Capital ratio9.99%14.46% (stronger)
Problem loans1.81%0.56% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.11% (stronger)0.30%
Return on assets2.13% (stronger)1.34%
Loans ÷ deposits121.4%88.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits21.9%4.1% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), VisionBank leads on 2 and Toro Employees Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions