TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

WaFd Bank vs Cascade Federal Credit Union

Bank

WaFd Bank

Seattle, Washington · $10 billion – $100 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Cascade Federal Credit Union

Kent, Washington · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureWaFd BankCascade Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6188 (stronger)
Capital cushion4283 (stronger)
Loan quality79 (stronger)74
Earnings60100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity47100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9293 (stronger)
Peer percentile32nd92nd
Total assets$27.6B$392.6M
Deposits / shares$21.1B$339.4M
Capital ratio9.21%13.31% (stronger)
Problem loans0.63% (stronger)0.79%
Net charge-offs0.02% (stronger)0.28%
Return on assets0.99%2.44% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits95.1%53.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits31.1%13.5% (stronger)
Offices2103
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)93—
Complaints per $1B deposits4.4—
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)18.8%0.0%

Cascade Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), WaFd Bank leads on 2 and Cascade Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions