TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Wakefern Federal Credit Union vs Ukrainian National Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Elizabeth, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Ukrainian National Federal Credit Union

New York, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

54of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureWakefern Federal Credit UnionUkrainian National Federal Credit Union
TellerScore99 (stronger)54
Capital cushion100 (stronger)78
Loan quality96 (stronger)28
Earnings100 (stronger)21
Funding & liquidity99 (stronger)77
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)75
Peer percentile99th10th
Total assets$12.0M$155.1M
Deposits / shares$9.1M$135.0M
Capital ratio24.31% (stronger)12.76%
Problem loans0.13% (stronger)2.16%
Net charge-offs0.09%0.01% (stronger)
Return on assets2.03% (stronger)0.03%
Loans ÷ deposits42.9% (stronger)83.6%
Uninsured deposits16.4%7.9% (stronger)
Offices14
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—0.0%

Wakefern Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Wakefern Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Ukrainian National Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions