TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Walpole Co-operative Bank vs Cumberland Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Walpole Co-operative Bank

Walpole, Massachusetts · $100 million – $1 billion

83of 100
Strong

Credit union

Cumberland Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Cumberland, Rhode Island · Under $100 million in assets

78of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureWalpole Co-operative BankCumberland Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore83 (stronger)78
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality96 (stronger)68
Earnings65 (stronger)35
Funding & liquidity4296 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)97
Peer percentile84th59th
Total assets$646.5M$9.2M
Deposits / shares$509.2M$7.3M
Capital ratio18.82%19.26% (stronger)
Problem loans0.11% (stronger)0.95%
Net charge-offs0.00%-0.03% (stronger)
Return on assets1.13% (stronger)0.37%
Loans ÷ deposits107.9%44.2% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits23.8%18.6% (stronger)
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Walpole Co-operative Bank has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Walpole Co-operative Bank leads on 3 and Cumberland Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions