TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Waterfront Federal Credit Union vs Sno Falls Credit Union

Credit union

Waterfront Federal Credit Union

Seattle, Washington · Under $100 million in assets

73of 100
Strong

Credit union

Sno Falls Credit Union

North Bend, Washington · Under $100 million in assets

52of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureWaterfront Federal Credit UnionSno Falls Credit Union
TellerScore73 (stronger)52
Capital cushion85 (stronger)32
Loan quality6971 (stronger)
Earnings33 (stronger)22
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)80
Problem-loan coverage92 (stronger)85
Peer percentile47th11th
Total assets$93.2M$99.0M
Deposits / shares$81.7M$89.1M
Capital ratio13.49% (stronger)8.24%
Problem loans0.94%0.86% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.53%0.11% (stronger)
Return on assets0.33% (stronger)0.06%
Loans ÷ deposits62.6% (stronger)80.1%
Uninsured deposits6.5%3.9% (stronger)
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Waterfront Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Waterfront Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Sno Falls Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions