Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Wood & Huston Bank vs Omb Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Wood & Huston Bank | Omb Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 62 |
| Capital cushion | 66 (stronger) | 42 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 72 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 72 |
| Funding & liquidity | 55 | 56 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 85 |
| Peer percentile | 93rd | 27th |
| Total assets | $1.2B | $2.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.1B | $2.1B |
| Capital ratio | 11.55% (stronger) | 9.16% |
| Problem loans | 0.14% (stronger) | 0.83% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.06% | 0.04% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.08% (stronger) | 1.30% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 90.9% (stronger) | 98.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.9% | 20.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 11 | 8 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 3.4% | 5.3% |
Wood & Huston Bank has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Wood & Huston Bank leads on 5 and Omb Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.