Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Wood & Huston Bank vs The Bank of Advance
Metric by metric
| Measure | Wood & Huston Bank | The Bank of Advance |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 81 |
| Capital cushion | 66 | 80 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 75 |
| Earnings | 100 | 100 |
| Funding & liquidity | 55 | 57 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 93rd | 80th |
| Total assets | $1.2B | $509.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.1B | $438.7M |
| Capital ratio | 11.55% | 13.01% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.14% (stronger) | 0.75% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.06% (stronger) | 0.13% |
| Return on assets | 2.08% | 2.42% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 90.9% (stronger) | 91.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.9% | 25.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 11 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 3.4% | — |
Wood & Huston Bank has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 81). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Wood & Huston Bank leads on 4 and The Bank of Advance on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.