TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Ziegler Federal Credit Union vs Minnesota Catholic Credit Union

Credit union

Ziegler Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Minnesota Catholic Credit Union

Little Canada, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

78of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureZiegler Federal Credit UnionMinnesota Catholic Credit Union
TellerScore87 (stronger)78
Capital cushion100 (stronger)76
Loan quality6486 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)57
Funding & liquidity91 (stronger)87
Problem-loan coverage9696
Peer percentile83rd59th
Total assets$4.3M$38.6M
Deposits / shares$3.2M$33.8M
Capital ratio26.88% (stronger)12.62%
Problem loans1.09%0.43% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.10% (stronger)0.15%
Return on assets1.71% (stronger)0.94%
Loans ÷ deposits69.0% (stronger)72.8%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.1%
Offices22
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Ziegler Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Ziegler Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Minnesota Catholic Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions