TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Ziegler Federal Credit Union vs Wakota Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Ziegler Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Wakota Federal Credit Union

South St Paul, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureZiegler Federal Credit UnionWakota Federal Credit Union
TellerScore87 (stronger)66
Capital cushion100 (stronger)60
Loan quality64 (stronger)50
Earnings88 (stronger)67
Funding & liquidity9191
Problem-loan coverage96 (stronger)83
Peer percentile83rd32nd
Total assets$4.3M$44.8M
Deposits / shares$3.2M$39.4M
Capital ratio26.88% (stronger)10.95%
Problem loans1.09% (stronger)1.49%
Net charge-offs0.10% (stronger)1.13%
Return on assets1.71% (stronger)1.18%
Loans ÷ deposits69.0% (stronger)69.0%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)0.8%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Ziegler Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Ziegler Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Wakota Federal Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions